Privacy Matters. It's a hot topic at the moment with the Edward Snowdon leaks, conspiracy after conspiracy over mass government surveillance in the name of freedom. Apparently , if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear, but what does privacy mean to you?
Does privacy matters? What is privacy? To many, privacy means to be able to do something without the judgement, shame or humiliation from others. It could be wild singing, dancing in underwear or something else. The thought of someone else watching or finding out mortifies them. It's a case of "This is something I'm willing to do only if no one else is watching."
In the midst of all the revelations from Edward Snowden that the United States and its partners, unknown to the entire world, have converted the Internet, once heralded as a place where freedom of speech has free reign, into an unprecedented zone of mass indiscriminate surveillance.
Most people take the view that there is no real harm that comes from this large scale mass invasion of privacy because only people who are engaged in bad acts have a reason to want to hide and to care about their privacy.
This view is grounded in the proposition that there are two kinds of people in the world, good people and bad people. Bad people are those who plot terrorist attacks or who engage in violent criminality and therefore have reasons to want to hide what they're doing, they have reasons to care about their privacy.
Good people on the other hand, are people who go to work, get married, have some kids, pay your taxes, pay your bills, watch your TV, follow fashion. They use the Internet not to plot bombing attacks but to read the news, exchange recipes, do the grocery shopping, act normal, obey the law and those people are doing nothing wrong and therefore have nothing to hide and no reason to fear the government monitoring them.
These people are actually engaged in a very extreme act of self-deprecation. They have agreed that they will make themselves as harmless, as unthreatening and as uninteresting as they can so that they don't have to fear having the government knowing what they are doing.
The mentality is highlighted in this clear quote from Eric Schmidt from Google.
If you're doing something that you don't want other people to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.Eric Schmidt - CEO of Google
There are a number of things wrong with this mentality. First of which is that the people who think like that privacy isn't important, don't actually believe it. They take all kinds of actions to protect their privacy. They put passwords on their email and social media accounts. They close the curtains to stop people looking in. They probably even close the bathroom door; maybe even lock it as well. These are all steps designed to prevent other people from entering what they consider to be their private place.
As human beings we are social creatures. That means we have a need for other people to know what we're doing, saying and thinking. This is why we voluntarily publish information about ourselves online. Equally essential to what it means to be a free and fulfilled human being, we need to have a place that we can go to and be free of the judgemental eyes of other people.
There are all sorts of things that we think and do that we're willing to tell our doctor, lawyer, psychologist, spouse or best friend that we would be horrified for the rest of the world to learn.
There is a reason why we need privacy and that is that when we're in a state where we can be monitored, where we can be watched, and our behaviour changes dramatically. Our range of behavioural options that we consider when we think we're being watched is severely reduced. This is just a fact of human nature that has been recognized in social science, literature, religion and in virtually every field of discipline.
Shame is a very powerful motivator, as is the desire to avoid it. It is the reason why people in a state of being watched, make decisions that are not the by-product of their own behaviour but are about the expectations that others have of them or the mandates of societal orthodoxy.
In the 20th-century, French philosopher Michel Foucault realized that that model could be used not just for prisons but for every institution that seeks to control human behaviour - schools, hospitals, factories, workplaces. What he found was that the theory behind the Panopticon was the key means of societal control for modern, Western societies, which no longer need the overt weapons of tyranny — punishing or imprisoning or killing dissidents, or legally compelling loyalty to a particular party. This is because mass surveillance creates a prison in the mind that is much more subtle and a much more effective means of fostering compliance, more effective than brute force could ever be.
Bought anything from Amazon recently? Have you noticed that a seemingly unrelated website is showing adverts for the product you bought, or very similar products? How did they know that?
So to everyone reading this who still believes they don't worry about invasion of privacy because they have nothing to hide, I ask you to do this. In the comments section below send me all of your email addresses, with full server names, login id, and password details. I am going to go through all your emails and when I find something interesting, I am going to publish and share it over social media.
After all, if you're not a bad person, if you're doing nothing wrong, you should have nothing to hide.
My website and its content are free to use without the clutter of adverts, tracking cookies, marketing messages or anything else like that. If you enjoyed reading this article, or it helped you in some way, all I ask in return is you leave a comment below or share this page with your friends. Thank you.